Common Eating – 2 – Marking


One of the important parts of Common Eating as a course, is finding ways for the students to work together. The only problem with this is that I have a natural aversion to anything that resembles a group project. This is in part because I am an introvert among introverts. I’m also very independent. On my two choice Enneagram test I scored an 88 as a number 5.

When it comes to an idea like a course on Common Eating, it may seem a little odd to start with laying out a marking structure before deciding on what shape I would like such a course to take.  My reasoning for doing this however, is before I go about the work of course design, it seems to me that I want to know if I can come up with something that will pass academic muster as well contain useful and practical information and skills for ministerial development.  As far as I’ve observed over the years, the two don’t have to exist in tandem with each other.

So what appears below is a marking scheme, combine with a little bit of explanation.  The value may not add up to 100%, because I want to be able to play with the various components somewhat as I go along.

Marking Scheme:

Assignment 1:  Joint Cooking Assignment (10-15%).  This is intended to essentially be a marking gift.  If you do the assignment you will likely get full marks.  There are a couple of caveats.  I intend this to be a limited budget, limited ingredient assignment.  No one will be marked on quality, (depending on who your classmates are you may be judged, although they should remember, judge not lest you be judged).  Where you can lose marks here is by going over budget or going beyond the allowable ingredients.  This assignment is about learning how to cook and eat together, there are no bonus marks for culinary skills.  If there are few students, arrangements for the meals on weeks when students aren’t preparing will be made so that students don’t have to do more than one meal during the class.

I’m more convinced than ever that priests and ministers should all be able to cook at least a very simple meal. 

Common Eating Soup
A simple bowl of soup with a bit of bread on the side makes for a fine meal, especially when shared with classmates.

Assignment 2:  Visit to Cook for/with and Eat With Clients of a Local Community Food Program (10-15%)

This assignment would have two components to it.  The actual visit, and the submission of a 3-4 page theological reflection on the visit.

Assignment 3:  Organizing and Leading One of The Eucharists that Are Part of the Class.  (10 – 20%)

Each student would be required to organize the weekly Eucharist that is part of the class.  Depending on number of students this might have to be a team assignment as well.  The value of the assignment would depend mainly on the number of people preparing each week.  For students whose traditions don’t allow them to conduct the whole Eucharist, arrangements will need to be made to provide an appropriate individual as necessary.

This is still the trickiest part of the whole course. Particularly for those in the Anglican tradition. 

Assignment 4 –  Exegetical Exercise (20%)  Students will be required to take a Biblical Passage dealing with a meal (there are more than the last supper), and present an exegetical paper on it.  The paper should show interaction with the text, understanding of the cultural issues at play, understanding of the setting in relationship to the religious activities of Israel or the Church depending on where the passage is taken from. 4-6 Pages.

I may actually exclude the Last Supper from this assignment. However, I think that would mean I would need an assignment that deals strictly with the last supper. 

Assignment 5 – Book Report (15%) A report on one of the books from the bibliography.  Book report should contain general overview of the book, theological perspectives gained/questions raised by the book, and practical ways for implementing the ideas contained in the book. 4-6 Pages.

The books do not need to be specifically Christian in nature. In fact I’d kind of hope they weren’t. Instead I would hope students could take any food book, and interact in theological fashion with the book.

Assignment 6 – Plan a community meal working under your local church’s kitchen committee. (25%)

The assignment is what it says.  The student would get together with the local church’s kitchen committee, and with them overseeing the process would plan a community dinner.  The minister/priest supervising the student’s ministry will need to be in on this planning process.  Where there is no kitchen committee the student would be responsible for the organization under the supervision of someone appointed by the priest/minister.  Afterwards the student would be required to submit a 3-4 page theological reflection.

One thing that priests and ministers are taught very little about on their road to ordination is their relationship with various groups within a parish. Part of this lies in the fact that when it comes to learning the ins and outs of parish life, is that the previous generation seemed to be taught that the best way to learn about parish life is to let the up and coming priests and ministers make as many mistakes as possible and then laugh at them and say, that’s how I learned. 

This to my mind is a stupid and unproductive approach, as it leaves the newbies with a negative experience. As a new priest/minister, you are going to make mistakes no matter how much guidance. Multiplying those mistakes does no good for anyone. 

So that ended with a possible 110%.  This allows for some room in the way the assignments are graded.  This also calls for between 14-20 pages of written work.  Again, these are just suggestions, if anyone has other ideas I’d love to hear them.  As well, if there are ideas as how this could be tightened up academically, I’d love to hear them as well.

Please feel free to leave the suggestions in the comments section below.

Advertisements

7 comments

  1. Hello. I’m finding this concept really fascinating and a good idea for a Seminary elective (though I would prefer it be mandatory in Practical Theology because it has *huge* application in Parish life). I have experience as a college instructor and course designer, and one *huge* element you’re missing is attendance. In my opinion this should be a major portion of the course grade. It should be dependent not just on attendance, but on preparation when they arrive, and whether they arrive on time or not. These can be crucial ancillary issues in hospitality and visitations – food-based or otherwise. I look forward to reading your other posts on this topic! Frankly this also has broader application as a parish “Bible study” or training for Elders/presbyters/other lay leaders.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.